Jack Straw has said Gordon is the "right man" to lead Labour in the wake of mounting speculation over the prime minister's future.The justice secretary has moved to stress his public backing for Mr Brown even after the party's damaging by-election defeat in Glasgow East. And while reports had claimed Mr Straw was likely to challenge Mr Brown for the party leadership, the former told the BBC the prime minister has his full support. "I am absolutely convinced that Gordon Brown is the right man to be leading the Labour Party," Mr Straw said in a statement issued on Saturday. "I was convinced of that when I was his campaign manager last year and nothing that has happened since has changed that view. "The result in Glasgow East was obviously disappointing but it would be a big mistake for the Labour Party to now turn in on itself and indulge in a summer of introspection." A number of Sunday newspapers have claimed former minister George Howarth, an ally of Mr Straw's, is canvassing support among Lancashire MPs for a leadership bid on Mr Straw's part. However, Mr Howarth denied the reports, saying: "Jack is not up to anything. If anyone thinks I am collecting names for him, they are mistaken." With Mr Brown on holiday with his family, former cabinet minister David Blunkett warned unhappy Labour MPs to fully consider the efficacy of a leadership change. "The issues that affect people are not ones which divide the party or Gordon Brown from any potential successor," he told the BBC. "Secondly, we don't have the mechanisms - we are not a hatchet job party like the Conservatives who can drop their leader literally at the drop of a hat. "So grow up, don't go for what might be a popular quick fix that you couldn't actually put in place and let's actually combine in the way we know best and work out what will actually reach people."
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Jack Straw gives public backing to embattled Gordon Brown
Jack Straw has said Gordon is the "right man" to lead Labour in the wake of mounting speculation over the prime minister's future.The justice secretary has moved to stress his public backing for Mr Brown even after the party's damaging by-election defeat in Glasgow East. And while reports had claimed Mr Straw was likely to challenge Mr Brown for the party leadership, the former told the BBC the prime minister has his full support. "I am absolutely convinced that Gordon Brown is the right man to be leading the Labour Party," Mr Straw said in a statement issued on Saturday. "I was convinced of that when I was his campaign manager last year and nothing that has happened since has changed that view. "The result in Glasgow East was obviously disappointing but it would be a big mistake for the Labour Party to now turn in on itself and indulge in a summer of introspection." A number of Sunday newspapers have claimed former minister George Howarth, an ally of Mr Straw's, is canvassing support among Lancashire MPs for a leadership bid on Mr Straw's part. However, Mr Howarth denied the reports, saying: "Jack is not up to anything. If anyone thinks I am collecting names for him, they are mistaken." With Mr Brown on holiday with his family, former cabinet minister David Blunkett warned unhappy Labour MPs to fully consider the efficacy of a leadership change. "The issues that affect people are not ones which divide the party or Gordon Brown from any potential successor," he told the BBC. "Secondly, we don't have the mechanisms - we are not a hatchet job party like the Conservatives who can drop their leader literally at the drop of a hat. "So grow up, don't go for what might be a popular quick fix that you couldn't actually put in place and let's actually combine in the way we know best and work out what will actually reach people."
Scottish Labour leader race begins
The race to succeed Wendy Alexander as leader of Scottish Labour is set to begin with the three main contenders all but established.Results will not be known until mid to late September but the party's procedure committee is now arranging to meet with nominations to be invited immediately afterwards. Three former Cabinet ministers are considered frontrunners: Iain Gray, Cathy Jamieson and Andy Kerr. Further candidates could include fellow MSPs Ken Macintosh and Charlie Gordon, but it is uncertain if they will be able to secure sufficient nominations. Margaret Curran was also expected to enter the contest, but her defeat in Glasgow East appears to have dampened the chances of that happening. Indeed, the leadership contest itself has been delayed by the by-election. Mr Kerr has said he wants to post of the Scottish leader to have more power. Speaking to BBC Radio Sctoland, Mr Kerr said: "I have to say I think the leader in Scotland needs to have a much wider voice, a much more influential voice and a much stronger voice. "That's what I intend to say during the campaign." It was triggered by the resignation of Ms Alexander after the Scottish parliament's standards committee banned her from parliament for one day following a failure to declare donations on her register of interests. Party MSPs, MPs members and affiliated unions will be eligible to vote. The unofficial opening of the contest follows news of the death of former Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Lord Russell-Johnston. He was also MP for Inverness, deputy leader and a member of the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly. Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg called him "an institution in his own right".
Cameron reunited with bike after Sunday tabloid search
David Cameron's stolen bike has been found and returned after a Sunday newspaper worked with the local community.The Conservative party leader reported his bike stolen after it disappeared while he shopped at a Tesco near his home on Wednesday. Mr Cameron chained his bike to a railing before entering the supermarket to buy salad, only to emerge and find it had been stolen. But after the Sunday Mirror newspaper worked with "local community elder" Ernest Theophile, the bicycle has been found missing its front wheel in a nearby side street, but with Mr Cameron's helmet and lock still attached. "Thank you very much indeed," the old Etonian told the newspaper. "I'm very surprised to have it back, it's incredible. I never thought I'd see it again. "It's priceless to me. I've done over a thousand miles on it and three sponsored bike rides of 250 miles each, so it's like an old friend. It's fantastic." He added: "I'm surprised they didn't take the helmet - you'd think they would get something for that on eBay." Mr Theophile, a Labour voter who runs a "social business" selling electric-powered eco-bikes with the help of troubled teenagers to keep them from a life of crime, said he was glad to have helped. "After a chat with some of the kids, I got their trust and respect and they told me where the bike was," he said. "It just shows that the kids want to do good. It's just about the right communication with them." He continued: "You never want to see anyone have their bike nicked - not even a Tory."
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Glasgow East as-it-happened
Welcome to politics.co.uk's As-It-Happens page. Here you can keep up to date with major parliamentary debates, press conferences or news events in real time. Just hit refresh on your browser to see the latest development.This event is now over, but you can see how it happened below. Polls have opened in Glasgow East for what's gearing up to be the most pivotal by-election of Gordon Brown's leadership. We will be here all day and night covering events as they happen until the result is announced. The Scottish National party (SNP) candidate, John Mason, cast his vote already - along with the first few voters assembling at the polling station. The SNP tell me all four voters before him said they were voting SNP, but then that's the kind of thing you say when greeted by a bunch of activists. Heading into the polling station in Barlanark, Mr Mason said: "I urge everyone in Glasgow East, young and old, to go to your polling station today, cast your vote for the SNP and send a strong message to Gordon Brown that it's time for a fair share for the East End. Glasgow East deserves a real local MP to make your voice heard in Westminster. It's a beautiful day, there is a feel-good factor in the air and people across this constituency will be using today as their opportunity to send a message to Gordon Brown. It has been a privilege to campaign across the Glasgow East constituency and it will be an honour to be chosen to serve as the MP for Glasgow East, to represent the many people I have met on the doorsteps, in the shopping centres and at community organisations across the constituency. Send a message to Gordon Brown, vote SNP today." Margaret Curran, Labour's candidate, had this to say: "Over the last few weeks I have talked to thousands of people about their priorities for the future of this area. I believe I have run a positive campaign that has chimed with the real concerns of East Enders, today however every voter faces a clear choice between a fighter and a message boy for Alex Salmond. Whatever their choice, I have one simple message for each and every person in the East End and that is to get down to the polling station and use your vote today." OK, so here are the stats: The current Labour majority stands at 13,507 on a turnout of 30,900 in the last general election. That gives Labour 61 per cent of the vote to the Scottish National party's (SNP) 17 per cent. But what the nationalists have is momentum, and, well, the negative momentum of Labour. Everyone wants to give Gordon Brown a kicking right now, especially since the government – in their infinite wisdom – decided to unveil their reforms to unemployment and incapacity benefit right before today's vote. Not a terribly clever thing to do in a constituency where 10,000 people are on unemployment benefit alone. We would have berated them for Machiavellian scheming if they'd postponed it for the sake of a by-election, of course, but one of the best things about being a journalist is having your cake and eating it. That's the kind of thing we say to each other while looking ahead to 16 uninterrupted hours of local by-election coverage. Despite everything, most analysts are expecting a Labour win today, but by a perilously thin margin. Anything under 5,000 and expect nasty headlines for Labour tomorrow. If they actually lose the seat things get really serious. Leadership speculation will run rampant, the newspapers will explode with barely concealed glee and Labour will be wracked with self-doubt. The chances of an actual leadership bid are small though. Senior party figures know it will do their 2010 election prospects no good to have installed two unelected prime minister in a row and anyway, most of the politicians and political journalists are going on holiday, so there's very few people around to kick up a fuss. Our man in the SNP sounds very sunny, very optimistic. Apparently two planes left crossed contrails above Glasgow earlier today, making it look like the St Andrew's flag had appeared in the sky behind John Mason's head as he was speaking. This, we're told, is a very good omen. "I'm walking along the street, about to go knocking on doors," he says. "We've been very well received on the doorstep – the people are looking to find change. The idea of the SNP government opposed to the Labour government has given us a good edge, it's given people hope that things can be better. We've been working non-stop for the last three weeks. I stopped about 9.30 last night, got a few hours sleep and up again at six this morning. I reckon we'll go right through till after the count. There may be a celebration tonight." Labour is being credited with running a professional campaign though, flooding the constituency with volunteers and making full use of Ms Curran's undoubted capacity for political campaigning. Volunteers got up bright and early this morning, a spokesman tells us, and were delivering leaflets by five in the morning. Over 400 Labour volunteers are in Glasgow East today and they just started knocking on doors. It's always best to be cautious about timing – waking someone up is a bad way of convincing them to vote for you. Ms Curran has been out talking to voters this morning, but she just started a whistle-stop tour of 'human traffic' areas – shopping centres, train stations, that sort of thing – and then it'll be back to knocking on doors a little later. Glasgow East is traditionally a place of low turn-outs. In 2005 it was just 48 per cent compared to a 61 per cent national average. But today may be different. The sun is out, the constituency has been the centre of national debate for months and voters have a real feeling of being able to inflict change on the political system. Now's probably as good a time as any to give you the full list of candidates: Chris Creighton - Independent Frances Curran - Scottish Socialists Margaret Curran - Labour Eileen Duke - Scottish Green Hamish Howett - Freedom-4-Choice Tricia McLeish - Solidarity John Mason - Scottish National party Davena Rankin - Conservative Ian Robertson - Liberal Democrat No one bothered talking about the other parties during this election, mostly because everyone started salivating with excitement the second they realised the SNP might actually steal it. But there are, in fact, other parties out there – or so we're told. After a few phone calls trying to get hold of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat teams we can officially tell you they may not exist. No responses, no phone calls back, and a slightly bemused attitude all round from those on the receiving end of our enquiries. But we will get hold of them - mark our words - and bring their words of wisdom here for your appreciation. Things always get a little weird on the day of the vote. Suddenly the rabid enthusiasm of candidates and their campaign spokespeople turn into a sort of cheery fatalism. Everyone downplays their chances at this stage – the candidates, the campaign team and eventually, through a sort of social osmosis, the media. Well, things are going that way right now. Insiders are saying late canvassing results for Labour looked bad last night with the predicted margin of victory looking like it's in the hundreds. David Cairns, the Scottish office minister running Labour's campaign, says: "It is going to be tight. It is too close to call." Calum Cashley, the SNP's candidate for the Westminster seat of Edinburgh North and Leith, is upbeat about the situation. "Everyone's here in high spirits," he said. With the first knockup completed there's still a long way to go until polls close at 10:00, but it's all positive in the SNP camp. "I'm very optimistic about this one. I think if things continue the way they are we'll come away with an MP," Mr Cashley says. "Some people are saying it's on a knife-edge, but people like myself are predicting a 1,000 majority." Contact with the Lib Dems. A couple of interesting points here. Firstly, they think the battle for third and fourth place is as tight as that for first and second, with the Tories and them battling it out this afternoon on doorsteps. The Liberals are currently at third place in the Westminster vote (fourth on the Scottish vote). Secondly, it looks like Lib Dem insiders think Labour will take it tonight - but only just. Things looked very different a week ago, I'm told, but right now it looks like Labour are going to slip through. "If the nationalists take it it'll be because Labour lost it, not because they won it," he says. Whatever anyone else might say about the campaign, it's certainly had a good effect on the morale of Glasgow East's constituents. Being in the glare of national publicity has had a strange effect on them. "They're a bit cheesed off at being painted as backward," Calum Cashley tells us. Is this one of the 'poorest constituencies in the country'? Certainly not - "although there's a lot of poverty here there's decent people right across the constituency". But are they decent enough to vote SNP? What fantastic weather we've had in Glasgow East. A glorious day across the city – and of course that will be having its own effect. Turnout may will be driven higher than the somewhat disappointing 48 per cent seen in the 2005 election. Of course all parties will be benefiting from the good weather, but it may have driven some less experienced campaigners into complacency. Woe betide those who assume their vote is already out and decide to slack off down the pub. Not much chance of that happening here, of course, as all involved are working the front doors hard. And who is this, coming in from the cold after their agonising wilderness years? Why, it's the Scottish Conservative party. The Tories haven't had the best of times north of the border recently but, if the mood of spokesman Ramsay Jones is anything to go by, that's all about to change. "We've campaigned with a smile, we've campaigned on local issues – we've proved we're in the mainstream of politics in every seat in Scotland," he says. Will it be enough to pip the Lib Dems into third place? The race for a podium finish looks like being as close as the SNP-Labour battle itself. And that is it, ladies and gentlemen. The polls are closed. The die is cast. Hundreds of exhausted activists can finally stagger off to the nearest bar – before returning, finally, to the campaign HQ for a few hours' nervous wait. It looks like Labour are going to scrape this one – but we can't be certain and the majority looks like being slashed for sure. The Tories continue their upbeat message. They are in the unique position, Ramsay Jones explains, of being out of government while being able to show the difference they are making. Extra police by 2011, a new national drug strategy for Scotland and accelerated cuts for business rates in Scotland, he says, have all seen the light of day thanks to the Scottish Conservatives. Crime is bothering Glasgow East constituents, that's for sure. "We can genuinely say on the crime front, we are delivering." Whether the Tories will break through the seven per cent mark this time round remains to be seen, however. The SNP camp, meanwhile, is feeling pretty good about things right now. Activists have gathered for their after-work party, "exhausted" in most cases after three weeks' hard work. The 'ten-to-ten' test, when polling stations are just about to close and the final rush is underway, appears to have gone their way. Labour, apparently, were "knocking every door with a light on – they obviously didn't know where their vote is". The SNP, by contrast, were conducting an organised campaign and so it's no surprise, Calum Cashley tells us, "there's a good feeling here". Sources are telling us the result is expected around 01:00 BST. Looks like I'm in line to win that bet. The official turnout figure is in – and it's surprisingly low, at a meagre 42.25 per cent. That's substantially down on the 48 per cent figure seen in 2005 and comes despite an excellent day weather-wise for voting. It suggests that the result will depend even more on who managed to get their vote out most effectively. SNP candidate John Mason has turned up at the count. His boxing champ impression for the cameras is truly cringeworthy, but at least he's getting into the spirit of things. Rumours are running around that the SNP have beaten Labour - in which case the partying has only just begun. People are becoming increasingly tense and, well, difficult as the results get closer. Trying to get a quote from Labour is like getting blood from a stone (there’s probably something meaningful in that) and the Lib Dems are no longer picking up their phone. Rumours of an SNP victory are rapidly building into fully-fledged assumptions. It’s past one o'clock, but we’re still expecting an announcement any time now. If you’ve followed by-elections before you’ll already know result times get pushed back further and further as each second passes. Along with the SNP/Labour rumours it’s becoming increasingly likely the Lib Dems have fallen to fourth place. Everyone in the hall is sitting down now and we should be in for the announcement any second. Whatever you do don't quote me on that. Someone's got up to speak, meaning all candidates are about say whether they accept the legitimacy of the result and the returning officer should announce the result in a couple of minutes. It's been a long night and emotions in the hall are running high. This is where we find out if those SNP rumours turn out to be true. Something very bad has happened. It looks like there's going to be a recount. I told you not to quote me. Conversations among the candidates' teams have become very animated. Just how bad is this? Well, our bedtime just faded into the horizon. It's still not clear who is calling for the recount, if indeed it actually exists. All you can hear in the hall is the word 'recount', with a bunch of other words around it. Rumours are that the result looked like an SNP win of just a couple of hundred votes. OK so here's the latest. It appears the SNP victory consists of less votes than those going to Francis Curran - the Scottish Socialists candidate with the same surname as the Labour candidate. Her name appears just above Margaret Curran's and Labour seem to think enough people made a mistake here. Of course it is just about possible all those people voted for Francis Curran because they liked her, but that theory doesn't seem to be on Labour's radar right now. Contradictory ideas are floating around as to whether it's a partial or full recount. Everyone's watching the people doing the counting like anthropologists watching monkeys during a particularly vital experiment. On the basis that no one has announced a full recount, it's much more likely to be a checking of certain bundles. Whatever the extent of the recount there's very little chance of the result coming in before 03:00 BST. The one thing we do know is this: Labour called the recount, and barring something terribly odd going on in their brains that means they lost the first count by a very small margin. It's confirmed. This is a full recount. Every bundle is being checked. But you can scrap our previous 03:00 prediction. Apparently, the announcement will come within the next ten minutes. We don't believe that for a second, but it bodes well for a result in the next half hour. The candidates are being called up to the stage. The returning officer is gathering them together by the side of the stage. It looks like we're finally about to get a result. Labour have officially lost Glasgow East. The Tories have pushed the Lib Dems into fourth place. Here are the final results: SNP - 11,277 Labour - 10,912 Conservatives - 1,639 Liberal Democrats - 915
I'm getting on with the job, Brown insists
Gordon Brown has ignored the shockwaves caused by the Labour by-election defeat in Glasgow East to insist he is "getting on with the job".The Scottish National party (SNP) overturned a 13,000-strong majority to win Labour's third-safest seat across the country. Coming on the back of a similar defeat in the Labour heartlands of Crewe and Nantwich and the deposit loss in Henley, Mr Brown is facing fresh questions over the party's future and his as leader. But speaking ahead of his appearance at the Labour party's National Policy Forum he said he planned to get on with running the country. "People are worried at rising food and fuel prices and we've got to show that we know that; only we understand and hear them. "Labour will take them through these difficult times to help people and hardworking families who are hard pressed." The prime minister went on to say: "We had a great candidate and I'm sorry that we lost but I know that people are looking to the government for the action that's necessary. "We're looking at everything we can do for what is a global problem so we can help people through these difficult times and that's exactly that we will continue to do. "My task is to get on with the job of getting us through these difficult times. "I think people understand that what's happening is a global problem, it is happening to every country. "We are on the side of hardworking families to help them through difficult times and my whole focus is taking people through these difficult times," Mr Brown added. "And that is exactly what people want me to do."
Brown odds-on not to lead Labour
Gordon Brown is now odds-on not to lead Labour into the next general election, according to bookmaker William Hill.The vertiginous drop in Mr Brown's chances of remaining in his position follows Labour's disastrous result in last night's Glasgow East by-election in which they lost the seat to the Scottish National party (SNP). Mr Brown is now 4/6 to not lead his party into the next election. He's 5/6 to be gone by the end of the year and 10/1 to lose his seat at the next general election. The fortunes of those who might replace him remain temperamental. Jack Straw has slid into first place, his odds having been cut from 8/1 to 4/1. David Miliband's chances have dropped significantly from 2/1 to 9/2. Tellingly, the only possible comparison with current odds on a Tory victory at the next election is Tony Blair in 1997. The Conservatives are now 1/4 favourites to win the next election. "This has to be the final nail in the Labour coffin and the odds suggest that Gordon Brown is living on borrowed time," said William Hill spokesman Rupert Adams.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Cameron eyes Tory-UUP alliance
The Conservative party is seeking to broaden its appeal beyond England with an alliance with the Ulster Unionist party (UUP).Tory leader David Cameron and UUP counterpart Reg Empey reveal their intention to form an alliance in a joint article written in today's Telegraph newspaper. In return for UUP MPs in Westminster taking the Conservative whip they will be offered ministerial seats in a Tory government, should Mr Cameron's party win the next general election. The Tories may not need seats outside England to form the next government and are seeking to broaden their appeal to voters in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. They are expected to come in fourth place in Glasgow East's by-election, which is taking place today. If Labour manage to recover from their current poor performances in the polls, however, analysts say a hung parliament is a possibility – in which case extra seats helping the Tories could swing who forms the next government in their favour. In the Telegraph article Mr Cameron claims he wants Northern Ireland to become a "normal" part of the UK. The best way to show that is to have Northern Ireland MPs "supporting and serving in a Conservative government", the Tory leader suggests. Mr Cameron claims that it is wrong that people in Northern Ireland are not represented by a party that also deals with issues not covered by the country's devolved assembly. "Like most others in the UK, what really worries them is social breakdown, fuel duties, the 10p tax row, excessive regulation on business, pensions and the Lisbon treaty. There is a real danger that some of Northern Ireland's politicians will continue to look inwards and become 'Ulster Nationalists'," he writes. Certain details are still to be agreed in the partnership, including whether the UUP party name will remain or whether it will come under the Conservative party banner.
Glasgow East reactions
The Scottish National party (SNP) has pulled off a remarkable by-election victory in Glasgow East, winning a 22.5 per cent swing against Labour. Here's instant reaction from all the main parties.SNP – Calum Cashley"There's several wry smiles around the place. We're delighted – we always thought we could win it, but actually being proven that we can is great. This is the third safest seat in Scotland. We've taken it now so it's now there's not a safe seat in Scotland. We think we can move Scotland forward. "The Labour party was in trouble before now. I think now they have to go away and think about what they're for - they have to be re-examine where they are. They've taken the people of Scotland for granted for too long. "If it was just a standard by-election then you wouldn't expect this kind of reaction. We were obviously delighted but it's not just a swing in a seat – it's a general movement throughout Scotland." Scottish Conservatives – Ramsay Jones"We came into this election telling ourselves our primary goal was getting into third place – we've come out of it with nearly twice the Lib Dem vote. We've shown despite the enormous squeeze that we can fight an election in the [Conservatives'] 401st most winnable seat. "It was a big squeeze but our vote has held up. We've shown tonight Scottish politics is a three-horse race. I think, in a general election, there are really only two parties that can form a UK government. Then there's the choice between an ailing Labour party and the rejuvenated Conservatives. We can come away with our head held high." Scottish Liberal Democrats - spokesperson"There’s no doubt we got squeezed in this election. Soft Labour votes transferred directly to the SNP and not the other parties. “I don’t think it’s a problem generally in Scotland. If you travel a few miles north to the Glasgow North constituency we’re in with a great shot at the next election. “I think we’ve seen in this election it’s a battle between two governments and we’ve suffered because of that.” Scottish Labour - spokesperson"This is a very disappointing result for us. "Margaret was an outstanding candidate. "We will of course work hard to win back the trust of the people of Glasgow East at the next general election because we will always stand up for the East End."
Analysis: SNP victory
Tonight’s vote signifies three things: The slow electoral death of the Labour party, the chasm dividing Scottish and English politics and the emergence of Scottish independence as a tangible possibility.By-elections come and go and they all appear very important at the time, but rarely do they have repercussions which genuinely shake the political landscape for years to come. Tonight is different. If any government has ever faced an out-and-out announcement of its own demise, Labour is facing it tonight. The party has lost its safest seat in the country. No Labour MP can honestly look at his or her seat now and feel anything but a nervous shudder of apprehension. That’s important, because personal apprehension is what political mutinies are made of. The prospect of an actual leadership bid is unlikely. This is partly due to timing – parliament is in recess and the party conferences are still a couple of months away. But it’s also for strategic reasons. Two unelected prime ministers in a row smells unconstitutional, in that vague way that people refer to the non-existent British constitution, and anyway there’s no obvious candidate. The mere fact front benchers like Burnham or Harman are talked about as leadership material is proof of that. But what tonight will do is reduce Gordon Brown’s authority to miniscule proportions. It was low when he lost Crewe and Nantwich and lower still when he relied on the DUP to force the 42-day detention plans through, but by this stage it’s barely existent. The summer will be spent planning the fightback, one that will presumably begin with his speech to the party conference at the end of the summer. It’s difficult to envisage how any kind of fightback could conquer this level of disaster, and one can safely presume it won’t. The Scottish National party (SNP) has enjoyed a boost it has never experienced before. The party have never won a by-election in government. This is an un-travelled road for the nationalists, but one that leads to a place they very much like the sound of. It’s a measure of how well the party has done that the Tories came in third place without any improvement in their vote. The SNP squeezed every centre-left party around and the Liberal Democrats suffered at their hands just as Labour did. Tonight’s vote confirms what many people have suspected for a long time - that the politics of England and Scotland are travelling in markedly different directions. As England becomes increasingly attracted to a centre-right party, echoing trends across western Europe, Scotland has made its preferences clear: The winning party pursued a consistent centre-left approach to government. They have ignored calls for university tuition fees, they have scrapped prescription charges, they have made their objections to Westminster’s foreign policy more than clear and they have made considerable political capital out of Labour’s efforts to pursue a courtship of middle England. Mr Brown’s decision to invite Margaret Thatcher to Downing Street, his spectacular own goal on the 10p income tax rate and recent reforms to welfare have obviously not gone down well in this poor area of Glasgow. Labour is now paying the price in Scotland for what it thought was necessary to retain power in England. The supreme irony is that it’s Mr Brown’s sheer Scottishness that makes many English voters mistrust him. This national divide is more evident tonight than it has been for some time and it extends beyond simple political analysis. The SNP’s new-found momentum, all of it following explicit manifesto promises of a referendum on Scottish independence, indicates not just a second term for the party but also a willing audience for their message when a referendum finally does come. Whether that will be enough to make Scots vote for independence is still uncertain. They have certainly shown few signs of being that committed to the cause before. But there is little doubt now that the referendum would result in vastly expanded powers for the devolved Scottish parliament, at the very least. Mr Salmond said this by-election would create a вЂpolitical earthquake’. It’s obvious now he was more right than he was wrong. But Labour’s disaster tonight will not just affect the party. It may well have consequences for the country as a whole. Ian Dunt
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Analysis: politics.co.uk poll
Today's poll presents some interesting results – some of them surprising, some less so.Probably the most important result concerns the number of people who believe Gordon Brown should resign if Labour lose tomorrow. Should that happen, the chances of Mr Brown having to fall on his sword are slim to non-existent. There are practical reasons for that - most politicians and journalists are on holiday meaning party political and media pressure will be weak. And there are strategic reasons - most senior Labour figures think it would do the party more harm than good. But there is still something to be learnt by finding out how many people think it would be the correct thing to do. And that number is – for Labour – perilously high. Exactly half of those asked thought he should resign, while only 42 per cent said he should stick it out. Now there are many people out there who will agree to Gordon Brown resigning regardless of the reasons why. But the result does seem to point to a general feeling that Labour's obscenely bad results of late require some radical thinking if an electoral catastrophe is to be avoided in 2010. Limited signs of recovery in recent polls – yesterday's Guardian/ICM survey put Labour up three to 28 per cent - have done little to change the party's fortunes. These uplifting results are less than surprising anyway. Labour support could only drop so low and it appears to have reached rock bottom. Alex Salmond should treat the results as an impressive confirmation of his leadership abilities. A 54 per cent approval rating is heartening in any politician's language, but taking into account the poll's contributors makes it all the more remarkable. Mr Salmond's success has been at least partly explained by the populist, centre-left policies he has adopted north of the border, such as abolishing prescription charges and refusing to charge university students tuition fees. But the politics.co.uk poll will include many respondents – probably a majority – who don’t live in Scotland. Without these economic incentives to make them take a shine, it's interesting his popularity level remains so high. Not only that, but many English respondents will take an a-priori dislike to any politician campaigning for Scottish independence, let alone the ringleader. The 51 per cent of respondents who believe the SNP would govern Glasgow East better than Labour reflect the dire economic state of the area, despite 50 years of Labour rule. Fifty-one per cent doesn't look that high, but take into account the quarter of respondents who answered 'don't know'. That means only 24 per cent disagreed with the statement. Finally, only 46 per cent of people think Labour can still win tomorrow. That's probably inaccurate – most analysts are expecting a Labour win, albeit a slim one on a drastically reduced majority. But the fact so many people have given up on Labour's chances in the kind of constituency the party was born to govern show just how negatively the public view Labour at the moment – not just in their own view, but in how they think other people view it. There have been very few polls recently which Labour insiders will read with a happy heart, and today's poll is no different. If Labour can salvage anything from their current predicament, its that with expectations this low, a victory tomorrow could be a springboard for more surprises in the future. That kind of optimism, though, is hard to find in the gloomy corridors of Labour central office.
Brown breaks ministerial code before break
Prime minister Gordon Brown published 10 written statements yesterday, the last day of business before Parliament breaks for summer recess.A total of 30 written ministerial statements were released, including announcement of gifts received by ministers and hospitality for guests entertained at Chequers. "The Prime Minister has violated his own Ministerial Code of Conduct 10 times in one day," said Norman Baker, Liberal Democrat MP. "[The] order paper shows 30 written statements being shoved out together, in clear violation of the rules." According to the Ministerial Code of Conduct, "every effort should be made to avoid leaving significant announcements to the last day before a recess." This was an attempt to bury bad news by releasing it all together before the recess, Mr Baker suggested. The summer recess ends on October 6th.
politics.co.uk poll spells trouble for Labour
Only forty-six per cent of people believe Labour can win the Glasgow East by-election, according to a politics.co.uk poll released today.The responses come despite more optimistic forecasts from political analysts over the last week. They will make depressing reading for the Labour party. Asked whether Gordon Brown should resign as prime minister if his party loses the by-election, half of respondents said he should. Only forty two per cent disagreed. The poll shows Alex Salmond's Scottish National party (SNP) retain an impressive level of support. Asked if the SNP would govern Glasgow East better than Labour, 51 per cent of respondents said they would, while only 24 per cent disagreed with the statement. But the highest result in the poll concerned the performance of Mr Salmond as Scottish first minister. Asked if he has been good at his job since coming to power a year ago, 54 per cent of respondents said he had been, with only 19 per cent saying he had been a bad first minister. Commenting on the results, Angus Robertson, SNP Westminster leader, said: "This is an excellent eve of poll election boost for John Mason and the SNP. "The results are fantastic – and they show that we are witnessing a tale of two governments. "Above all, these figures show that the SNP are on the people’s side, and Labour are out of touch." Mr Salmond gives every indication of sharing respondents' beliefs about tomorrow's vote. He has now begun to adopt the high-risk strategy of framing the by-election as a battle between the SNP and Labour, rather than local candidates. "It's a test of strength between two governments," Mr Salmond said. "On balance, most people are pretty satisfied with what they have seen from the SNP government in Edinburgh thus far. "Any by-election is a test of every party that contests it. One aspect of this election is a tale of two governments. People are passing judgment, clearly, on the Labour government at Westminster, but they're also passing judgment on the SNP government at Scotland. That's as it should be." The poll comes a day before the crucial by-election vote, which could see Labour lose power in the constituency for the first time in half a century. Most political analysts are still expecting Labour to retain its control of Glasgow East, but by a drastically reduced majority. politics.co.uk will be covering tomorrow's events as they happen.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Welfare reforms damage Labour's Glasgow campaign
Labour campaigners are ignoring questions about the wisdom of introducing welfare reforms during a by-election battle for Glasgow East, a constituency with 10,000 people on unemployment benefit.That particular benefit will now be replaced with an 'employment support allowance' for those with medical problems preventing them working and Job Seekers' Allowance for those who are fit to work. The Scottish National party (SNP) candidate, John Mason, launched an angry tirade against the proposals, telling the Scotsman newspaper it was "an own goal" for Labour. "The idea of scrapping incapacity benefit, which for many people who are genuinely disabled and genuinely ill is a lifeline, makes it very, very worrying for people," he continued. While he admitted some people would always misuse the benefit system to get out of having to work, Mr Mason voiced concern about Labour's tactics to deal with the problem. "The Conservative and New Labour idea that you therefore squeeze down the benefits, just squeeze out the people who misuse the system, I can't live with that. "We need to give a helping hand up. There are people out there who would love to get a job but they're just not finding a job." The reforms could mean people have to do community service, such a litter collection, in return for benefits. Other plans include health checks by doctors for those claiming incapacity benefit and the use of private companies to find jobs for people who have been out of work for over a year. Margaret Curran stood by the government proposals, despite increasing suspicion Glasgow East may be one of the first areas to pilot the reforms. "We have always said we need to tackle unemployment," she said. "We need to tackle people who have been left to languish on benefits by the Tories in the past. We want to create opportunities and skills for people. "We are damned if we do and damned if we don't. The principles of it are absolutely at the centre of the kind of work we need to take forward for the East End of Glasgow." Conservative support for the reforms mean the proposals will almost certainly turn into law.
politics.co.uk polls spells trouble for Labour
Only forty-six per cent of people believe Labour can win the Glasgow East by-election, according to a politics.co.uk poll released today.The responses come despite more optimistic forecasts from political analysts over the last week. They will make depressing reading for the Labour party. Asked whether Gordon Brown should resign as prime minister if his party loses the by-election, half of respondents said he should. Only forty two per cent disagreed. The poll shows Alex Salmond's Scottish National party (SNP) retain an impressive level of support. Asked if the SNP would govern Glasgow East better than Labour, 51 per cent of respondents said they would, while only 24 per cent disagreed with the statement. But the highest result in the poll concerned the performance of Mr Salmond as Scottish first minister. Asked if he has been good at his job since coming to power a year ago, 54 per cent of respondents said he had been, with only 19 per cent saying he had been a bad first minister. The poll comes a day before the crucial by-election vote, which could see Labour lose power in the constituency for the first time in half a century. Most political analysts are still expecting Labour to retain its control of Glasgow East, but by a drastically reduced majority. politics.co.uk will be covering tomorrow's events as they happen.
Senior MP Wright to step down
Public administration committee chairman Tony Wright will step down at the next election, his office has confirmed.Dr Wright, the Labour member for Cannock Chase, will not trigger a by-election with an immediate resignation on the grounds of ill health. Instead he will wait until the next general election before giving up his seat. This must take place by May 2010. "Although I am still very active now, future uncertainties about my health make it sensible for me to decide to stand down at the next election," Dr Wright said. "So I am resigning in order to spend more time with my doctors." Dr Wright was first elected for Labour in the 1992 election and has been chairman of the influential public administration select committee since 1999. He is currently receiving treatment for leukemia and kidney disease, including chemotherapy. Dr Wright's decision to hold on until 2010 will be a relief for Gordon Brown, whose electoral credibility has come under strain because of a string of recent by-elections. Labour currently holds a majority of 9,227 in Cannock Chase.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Davis scores impressive win
David Davis has won the Haltemprice and Howden by-election, extending his majority from 5,116 to 15,355 with 72 per cent of the vote."We have fired a shot across the bows of Gordon Brown's arrogant, arbitrary and authoritarian government," he said. But in a statement to journalists this morning Tory leader David Cameron was lukewarm on the chances of Mr Davis returning to the front bench. Saying he was "delighted" by the result, Mr Cameron continued: "I'll obviously talk to him about what the future holds but I have a very strong shadow cabinet. "David is a strong Conservative, a very big figure in our party, and I'm sure there's all sorts of ways in which he'll be able to contribute in the future." Labrokes have now put the odds on Mr Davis returning to the shadow Cabinet by the end of the year at 10/1. Mr Davis promised to now "fight Gordon Brown's vision of Big Brother Britain tooth and nail, to stop 42 days in its tracks, to prevent the disaster of ID cards before it happens, to protect our personal privacy from being ransacked by the ever-intrusive state". The result will be seen as a vindication of Mr Davis' stance. While turnout was significantly down, from 72 per cent to 34 per cent, the size of the majority in a contest where Tory voters could relax in the knowledge their party would remain in power indicates the public supported Mr Davis stance. Shan Oakes of the Green party came second getting, 1,758 votes. Joanne Robinson of the English Democrats was third with 1,714. The Labour party is standing by its decision not to field a candidate. Home Office minister Tony McNulty said the by-election had been "a vain stunt that became and remains a farce". "Labour never believed a parliamentary by-election should be held at taxpayers' expense to resolve tensions at the top of the Conservative party," he continued. The Liberal Democrats say David Davis is alone in his commitment to civil liberties in the Conservative party. "David Davis has done well in keeping the issue of 42 days detention without trial in the spotlight," said party leader Nick Clegg. "The Conservatives are a long way from being defenders of liberty. David Davis' lonely stand only highlights the big questions that still remain over whether the Conservatives really are committed to protecting our freedom," he added. Twenty-six candidates were running in the by-election, breaking the UK record previously set in 1993 in Newbury when 19 candidates ran. Of these, 23 lost their deposits. The by-election was triggered by Davis Davis' resignation from parliament as an MP, in the process losing his post as shadow home secretary. Mr Davis hoped to provoke a 'mini-referendum' on government authoritarianism, including ID cards, the DNA database, CCTV proliferation and, most importantly, 42-day detention. But Labour's decision not to field a candidate against him robbed Mr Davis of a media-friendly contest. The Liberal Democrats gave Mr Davis a clear run, highlighting the two party's close cooperation on resisting the government's pre-charge detention plans. Public opinion seemed to be with the Tory candidate however, with politics.co.uk's opinion poll showing high levels of support for Mr Davis. Mr Davis has been MP for Haltemprice and Howden since 1997 and previously enjoyed a majority of 5,116 over the Liberal Democrats – the constituency's second party. In the last general election Labour came third with 12.7 per cent of the vote, followed by the British National party with 1.7 per cent and UK Independence party with 1.4 per cent. There was a turnout of 70.2 per cent. That number was expected to drop yesterday, with the lack of any serious challenger deterring people from going to the polls. Indeed, in Mr Davis' interview with politics.co.uk, he admitted he might lose his deposit. Around 70,100 people are eligible to vote in the constituency, and polling stations remained open until 22:00 BST. The full list of candidates is as follows: Grace Christine Astley (Ind) David Laurence Bishop (Church of the Militant Elvis party) Ronnie Carroll (Make Politicians History) Mad Cow-Girl (The Official Monster Raving Loony Party) David Craig (Ind) Herbert Winford Crossman (Ind) Tess Culnane (National Front Britain for the British) Thomas Faithful Darwood (Ind) David Michael Davis (The Conservative party candidate) Tony Farnon (Ind) Eamonn Fitzy Fitzpatrick (Ind) Christopher Mark Foren (Ind) Gemma Dawn Garrett (Miss Great Britain party) George Hargreaves (Christian party) Hamish Howitt (Freedom 4 Choice) David Icke (no description given) John Nicholson (Ind) Shan Oakes (Green party) David Pinder (The New party) Joanne Robinson (English Democrats - Putting England First) Jill Saward (Ind) Norman Scarth (Ind) Walter Edward Sweeney (Ind) Christopher John Talbot (Socialist Equality Party) John Randle Upex (Ind) Greg Wood (Ind)
Opinion: Glasgow East is about more than just Gordon Brown
It's a sad indictment of the modern media that Labour's upcoming doomsday in Glasgow East is only really viewed through the prism of Gordon Brown's premiership.We're all used to it of course, and this website – and myself – are as guilty of it as anyone. The media treated the Blair-Brown war of attrition as a jovial way to introduce EastEnders fans to political journalism, relishing the opportunity to personalise what's usually a dry collection of policy proposals. Now we've constructed a tale of Brown the tragic non-leader, the man who craved power for so long he forgot why he wanted it in the first place. The man who rode the waves of national popularity until his dithering manipulation of a possible general election crushed his reputation for good. None of this is false. Actually, it's pretty spot on, but the by-election in Glasgow East reflects much more than the terminal decline of the prime minister, or even the Labour party itself. It reflects the abject failure of Labour to deal with a level of poverty and disadvantage that puts this country to shame. And the repercussions of the vote are about more than Mr Brown as well. They could eventually form part of the springboard that tears apart the United Kingdom. That sounds melodramatic, but the significance of what Glaswegian voters do on the 24th should not be understated. The SNP have pursued a sensible and highly effective programme since coming to power north of the border. By sticking to solid, hard to resist left-centre policies like refusing tuition fees and introducing free prescriptions, they have cemented two important ideas in the minds of the Scottish electorate. Firstly, that Scotland is separate from England and Wales. Not culturally, or historically, or even romantically separate - but politically separate. Separate on the ground. Separate in the delivery of services. Separate in actual fact. Secondly, they have the left the impression that, frankly, it's better to be in Scotland. What kind of low or middle income family could come to any other conclusion? Would you like to spend thousands on sending your child to university or would you rather not? It's a no-brainer, to borrow that torrid and ugly American phrase. Just ask the people of Berwick-upon-Tweed, a small town on the border of England and Scotland which recently professed a desire to come under Hollyrood's jurisdiction. That record, combined with Gordon Brown's utter inadequacy in government and the half a century of empty Labour promises in the constituency, could precipitate the most important SNP victory in its history. Yes, even more important than when they actually took power, because a win here will give Mr Salmond the kind of momentum with which he can ultimately make the case for an independent Scotland. I have been watching Alex Salmond for some time now, although I must confess to only taking a serious interest in him after an extremely eloquent speech against the Iraq war. There is very little he says or does which I find disagreeable. He adopts sensible, practical left-of-centre policies rather than abstract dogma and he gives every impression of caring intensely about his country. It's only when he talks about his main political objective – the separation of Scotland from the union, that my head and - yes - my heart, recoil in horror. What has brought us to this situation, where an MP quitting his seat grants the independence movement so much impetus? Commentators will tell you it is the weakness of Gordon Brown, the endless drama of his fall from grace. But that's not really it. Mr Brown is not half as unpopular in Scotland as he is in England. Yes, the government is disliked, but if Glasgow East votes against Labour on Thursday week – and that is still far from inevitable - it will be because of the party have failed them over and over again. A bad prime minister in a constituency well-cared for by his party, would still pull through. In the Calton ward of Glasgow East, male life expectancy stands at 53.9 years. I won't insult your intelligence by pretending you don't understand the ramifications of that number, but to put it in perspective, Iraqi life expectancy is 69 years. This level of poverty and lack of opportunity is a scandal in the world's fourth richest nation. But it is also a stain on the face of the Labour party, who have ruled the constituency for 50 years. If they lose now, the media will talk about Mr Brown and leadership bids and the dying days of a failing government. I will talk about that as well. But don't forget what an SNP vote means for Britain. And don't forget the neglect that got us into this position in the first place. Ian Dunt
Stand up for each other, says Smith
The public should be willing to "stand up for others" if they see a crime being committed, the home secretary has said.With 21 teenagers stabbed to death in London alone this year, some commentators have urged Britons to avoid intervening in fights or public scuffles. But shortly after London mayor Boris Johnson advised youngsters to "walk away" in these situations, Jacqui Smith has said she would hope people would be willing to intervene to help their fellow citizens. "I would never say 'Don't get involved'," she told the Daily Telegraph newspaper, stressing that was she was not urging people to "wade into a fight". "I hope that we don't live - and I don't believe incidentally that we do live - in a country where people aren't willing to stand up for others," she explained. Her remarks come after British Crime Survey figures revealed almost 130,000 knife crimes were committed in England and Wales in 2007. Speaking after the funeral of 16-year-old Ben Kinsella - who was stabbed to death in Islington after intervening in a fight outside a bar - Ms Smith admitted that she does share Mr Johnson's concerns over the safety of her children. The mayor had said he would advise his own children not to intervene in public violence, adding: "Whatever you do, if you see a fight in the street, don't risk it because someone could have a knife. I'm saying to kids: don't get involved, move away." And Ms Smith admitted: "I'm the mum of a teenage son. There is not a parent of a teenager who wouldn't worry about any kid, whatever colour or background, being stabbed."
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Brown refuses to set Iraq withdrawal date
Prime minister Gordon Brown has confirmed British troop levels in Iraq will decline but would not set a specific date for withdrawal.Mr Brown has arrived in Iraq for surprise talks with top Iraqi officials, a week ahead of a scheduled statement regarding the future involvement of British troops in the Middle Eastern country. And after Iraqi prime minister Nouri Maliki supported a proposal by US presidential hopeful Barack Obama for US troops to leave Iraq within 16 months, Mr Brown has confirmed that he plans to reduce the number of UK operatives stationed in the country. Since the invasion of the country in 2003, UK troops have decreased from 26,000 in number to the present contingent of 4,000. And following his meeting with Mr Maliki, Mr Brown told reporters travelling with him: "It's certainly our intention that we reduce our troop numbers but I'm not going to give an artificial timetable for the moment." He added: "The tests for us will be how are we meeting the objectives that we've set. What progress can we show?" In an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel, published on Saturday, Mr Maliki is quoted as saying: "US presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes." British soldiers have handed over various provinces - they were responsible for after the removal of Saddam - to Iraqi control and recently transferred responsibility for the city of Basra's security to local troops. In March, the government decided to scrap plans to call back 1,500 troops as security deteriorated in the southern Iraqi city. "Enormous progress has been made," Mr Brown said in a press conference on Saturday. "It's important to recognise that security, prosperity, local democracy - these are the things that we are trying to move forward and trying to achieve." He added: "I am very grateful for the way the British forces behaved in such an exemplary manner. Their professionalism, and their courage, and their dedication is very much part of the progress that has happened."
Rising fuel bills spell trouble for Labour
A Centrica report on rising domestic gas bills has triggered a torrent of abuse from the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, who are calling on the government to do more to help poorer households before the winter."Frankly it’s frightening that the Government has no strategy for protecting the poor against rising prices," said shadow energy minister Charles Hendry. "These price hikes will push well over a million more people into fuel poverty and pile on the pain to consumers already being hit by prices at the pumps and the checkouts," he continued. "The government needs to act immediately before this winter turns from a concern into a crisis." The Liberal Democrats said energy companies had recently received a £9 billion windfall due to the European emissions trading scheme and that they should use the money for a "massive home energy efficiency programme". Commenting on warnings home energy bills could rise by 60 per cent, party leader Nick Clegg said: "The time has come for the government to admit that many families are going to face an increasingly difficult struggle paying their fuel bills. "As the winter approaches, the energy firms should also be making sure that the poorest and most vulnerable customers are offered the best deals." The government has promised £225 million from energy companies to go towards their poorer customers, but analysts say that figure will only help 100,000 people, when over five million need assistance. Karen Jopley, head of public affairs at Friends of the Earth said the initiative "will only just begin to scratch the surface".
Unions present demands to govt
The government is being presented with a list of 130 coordinated demands by Britain's trade unions, it has been reported.The national minimum wage would apply from 18 rather than 21 as well as apprentices, according to the Guardian newspaper. Passenger train operators would become 'not-for-profit' companies and city academy staff would be paid the same as other school staff under the demands. Next week the Labour policy forum will meet to discuss the party's future direction and the unions, holding nearly a quarter of votes, will act as a bloc to push through their changes. Union leaders will meet with prime minister Gordon Brown to discuss their amendment list later today.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
One in five MPs has had mental health problems
One in five MPs has had mental health problems, a survey has revealed.The shocking statistic comes from a questionnaire completed anonymously by MPs, peers and parliamentary staff. Twenty-seven per cent of MPs admitted having a personal experience of mental health problems as did 17 per cent of peers and a well-above-average 45 per cent of staff. "These findings are an affront to democracy," said the chief executive of mental health charity Rethink, Paul Jenkins. "MPs and peers need to be free to bring their personal experiences to their vital democratic role. Instead they are being gagged by the prejudice, ignorance and fear surrounding mental illness." The report, published jointly by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Mental Health, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and several mental health groups, calls on a reform of the law whereby an MP must give up their seat for life if they are sectioned under the Mental Health Act for six months. Most of the 94 MPs questioned thought this should change. Mind's chief executive, Paul Farmer, said: "At a time when the government is appealing to employers to be more understanding about mental health issues as part of its aim to get people off benefits and back into workplace, it seems they should be looking to take action closer to home. "Repealing antiquated rules that ban MPs from returning to work after recovering from a mental health problem would send out a clear message to all employers that discrimination should not be tolerated." But one in three MPs said an expected hostile reaction from the media would stop them being open about mental health issues. This is in stark contrast to the example of Norwegian prime minister Kjell Magne Bondevik who publicly disclosed his experience of depression without any serious effect on his popularity. He went on to be re-elected. "When we invited Mr Bondevik to come to speak to MPs, he was amazed that had he been British he could not have stood for Parliament," said Stand to Reason director Jonathon Naess. "In a civilised society, people with experience of mental ill-health should not be restricted from being MPs, directors, partners, magistrates and jurors." The report follows revelations by John Prescott, former deputy prime minister, about his struggle with bulimia earlier in the year, which earned him considerable derision in the media.
Brown-friendly charity attacked over its independence
A thinktank with extraordinarily close ties to prime minister Gordon brown has been rapped by the Charity Commission for lacking independence.The Smith Institute retains a charitable status – giving it various tax exemptions – but the commission found trustees "did not adequately manage the risks to the independence of the institute and its reputation". "When a charity operates close to the political environment, it must safeguard its independence and ensure that any involvement it has with political parties is balanced," said Andrew Hind, chief executive of the Charity Commission. "Our inquiry has reconfirmed that the Smith Institute is a charity and has found that it is doing work of educational value. However, the Institute was vulnerable to the perception that it was involved in party politics – never acceptable for a charity." Gordon Brown refused to co-operate with the Commission's inquiry/ "After 18 months of investigation, the Charity Commission report confirms what has long been suspected: that the Smith Institute was umbilically linked with Gordon Brown and the Labour Party," said shadow charities minister Greg Clark. "Given the criticism of the Smith Institute centred on its relationship with Gordon Brown, it is shocking that Brown refused to respond to any correspondence from the Charity Commission during their inquiry." The judgment is a serious indictment of a group that maintains almost unprecedented levels of contact with the higher echelons of the Labour party. Its meeting are held in Number 11, Downing Street, and the director of the Institute, Wilf Stevenson, is one of the prime minister's closest friends. So much so, in fact, that Mr Brown was best man at his wedding. It was these ties with Mr Brown which provoked questions about the Institute's charitable status. Shadow chief secretary Theresa Villiers has also launched a freedom of information request to the Treasury asking for full details of Mr Brown's links with the group. In its report, the commission said the institute is a charity and conducts work for the public benefit which is freely available and has educational value. But it said trustees should be more engaged with the running of the institute given the nature of its activities and the political environment in which it operates. Trustees will now have to implement a governance review and report back to the commission in six months.
Analysis: Davis by-election
By-election analyses are always about pinning down the variables.Were people voting on national or local issues? How was the weather? Did the ruling party get its core vote out? But last night's vote brought in a whole new series of calculations. With only one of the three main parties running, and on a single issue campaign, it's hard to break the numbers down. What we know is this. David Davis tripled his previous majority while only half the people who voted last time bothered to turn up. There's a variety of reasons playing around here, and unwrapping them takes a little patience. On the one hand, voters already knew Mr Davis was going to win – there was no viable opposition – so one can presume this led many of them to stay at home. On the other, some people were clearly galvanised by his principled resignation and came out to support him. Perhaps they were simply enamoured with the idea of their local area being at the centre of national attention, or perhaps they wanted to support a politician standing up for what he believes in, or maybe they really disagree with 42-day detention and wanted to register their protest. It's difficult to tell. How many of those extra Davis votes were Lib Dems? The constituency's second party didn't stand, primarily because they agree with Mr Davis on the single issue the by-election was built around and also, probably, because they were sensible enough to comprehend one of the principle rules of the Art of War: when your enemies are tearing bits off each other, the wise man sits down and enjoys the view. Regardless of the reasons Mr Davis will feel vindicated this morning, and he is within his rights to do so. The last two weeks could have gone horribly, horribly wrong for him. What he can't claim – and he is beginning to sound as if he wants to – is a real proof of the British people's libertarian tendencies, or even the tendencies of the people of Haltemprice and Howden. Without a Labour opponent to trade ideas with, all other sorts of factors came into play, including, most importantly, the very real respect people had for his actions regardless of their opinion on 42-days. Quite what last night means for Mr Davis' future is harder to tell. He will now be confined to the backbenches for some time. But the strength of the result puts David Cameron in something of a bind. Can he really afford this strengthened political animal to sit agitatedly on the backbenches? These two former leadership contenders have all the hints of a Brown-Blair nightmare about them, and yesterday's by-election could be the opening salvo in a long war of attrition between them. But Mr Davis' greatest success – one he will only discuss in private, one imagines – is to pin the Conservative flag to the civil liberties debate in a way that was simply not the case a month ago. David Cameron is now repeatedly on the record on the subjects of 42-days, ID cards, the DNA database and even CCTV. If the Tories win the next election, which everyone now believes they will, David Davis may have done something with lasting ramifications for the British political landscape. Ian Dunt
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Ray Lewis dropped from MPs' questions
Ray Lewis, the former deputy mayor for young people, has been dropped from an evidence session of the home affairs committee following allegations about his past.London mayor Boris Johnson will now attend the session, where he is due to be grilled by MPs on policing and crime in the capital, with his deputy mayor for policing Kit Malthouse. Mr Lewis ran a highly praised club for disadvantaged urban youths called the Eastside Young Leaders Academy, whose combination of strict discipline and group activities he predicted would one day produce Britain's first black prime minister. He became immensely popular among the new forward-looking Conservative party, to the point of becoming the first stop for David Cameron following his election as leader. But the allegations which have taken him from office are lurid and diverse. He is accused of, among other things, failing to repay money to parishioners while serving in the Church of England, falsifying his position as a magistrate and inappropriate sexual behaviour. Having lost his position as deputy, Mr Lewis will no longer be required to attend the session. Topics to be discussed at the meeting include London's explosion of knife crime and allegations of racism at the Metropolitan police. Mr Johnson put cutting down on knife crime at the heart of his campaign to become mayor, but his period in power has seen no halt in the prevalence of attacks, with nine teenagers murdered in the capital since he became mayor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)